Abstract

Questions of evolution, diffusion, and socialization of international norms have been the primary focus of constructivist norm research for almost two decades now. The rich analytical and empirical material

стр. 63

gathered during this time has been undergoing a constant process of re-evaluation and improvement thanks to the introduction of new theoretical concepts and the expansion of analytical and country scope. Currently, norm research has developed into an independent research program within Western international relations theory. This article, thus, aims at providing a brief summary of Western constructivist approaches to the dynamics of international norms' diffusion, socialization and internalization, and at their critical assessment with regard to the most recent studies. Despite the fact that classical constructivist models (the "norm life cycle" model, the ‘spiral model' of human rights' change and the internalization/socialization model) have determined the development of future research for years to come, they are still not free from certain limitations and drawbacks. These include the rather narrow interpretation of "norms", as well as the linearity and even implicit determinism of classical models, which have traditionally treated norm evolution as a teleological process of promoting "good" norms, and conceived of socialization as a top-down process of instilling standards of appropriate behavior on the part of norm-promoters without any regard for the cultural and historical specificity of norm-takers. Taking into account the contributions from the most recent empirical studies and the newest conceptual approaches, one can define three central challenges currently facing constructivist norm development and diffusion models. First of all, they include the "decoupling" of human rights rhetoric and actual political behavior of states; second, the over-simplification of the "acceptance-rejection" dichotomy which cannot fully capture the dynamics of national and local reactions towards external norms; and finally, the problem of re-definition and contestation and the associated regress of already established international norms. Despite the existence of multiple unresolved issues, the epistemological openness of constructivist norm research has allowed them to make a number of rather successful attempts at synthesizing rationalist and constructivist approaches and, thus, determined the intensive process of critical reflection and creation of updated or new analytical models - a process which will surely be continued in the future.

Keywords: constructivism; international norms; human rights; norm evolution; diffusion; socialization; Europeanization; norm contestation; norm erosion.

<== попередня сторінка	\|	наступна сторінка ==>
CONSTRUCTIVISM IN THE STUDY OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS NORMS	\|	LOBBYING IN THE EU INSTITUTIONS

Не знайшли потрібну інформацію? Скористайтесь пошуком google:

Генерація сторінки за: 0.003 сек.