Structurally the kernel sentences coincides with the elementary sentence. The difference is, that the iattern of the kernel sentence is interpreted as forming the base of a oaradigmatic derivation in the corresponding sentence-pattern series.
Thus, syntactic derivation should not be understood as an immediate change of one sentence into another one; a pronounced or written sdntence is a finished utterance that thereby cannot undergo any changes. Syntactic derivation is to be understood as paradigmatic production of more complex pattern-constructions out of kernel pattern-constructoins as their structural bases. The description of this production («generation») may be more detailed and less detailed, i.e. it can be effected in more generalized and less generalized terms,depending on the aim of the scholar.The most concrete presentation concerns a given speech-utterance analysed into its derivation history on the level of the word-forms.
E.g. -«I saw him come».
This sentence is described in school grammar as a sentence with a complex object, which is syntagmatically adequate, though incomplete from the systemic point of view. The syntagmatic description is supplemented and re-interpreted within the framework of the paradigmatic description pre-senting the sentence in question as produced from the two kernel sentences: I saw him.+ He came.+I saw him come.
Переглядів: 463
Не знайшли потрібну інформацію? Скористайтесь пошуком google: